In the News

Links to western Montana Superfund and environmental cleanup issues in the media.

In the News
MTPR Commentary: The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 12, 2012)14.4 KiB960
Public invited to meeting on Butte Superfund site cleanup (Mar 23, 2011)26.1 KiB910
Meeting held on Butte Superfund site (Jan 13, 2011)26.4 KiB915
Work begins on contaminated site in Opportunity (Sept 5, 2012)26.8 KiB937
DEQ lowering SBC dam to prevent contamination (June 14, 2011)27.0 KiB936
Officials: Clark Fork cleanup nearing home stretch (May 4, 2010)27.0 KiB912
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB946
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB882
SBC fishable again after multi-million dollar cleanup (May 22, 2012)30.7 KiB902
Read Stacie Barry's dissertation abstract on Butte environmental health study (Apr 17, 2012)82.6 KiB1062
Letter: Butte Superfund five-year review shows mixed results (Mar 10, 2010)83.2 KiB1027
Butte NRD council ready to go (Feb 10, 2010)83.8 KiB999
Comment time on clean-up plan (Sept 9, 2009)84.3 KiB1045
Montana Pole meeting tonight (July 20, 2010)84.7 KiB1081
Creek rally is Tuesday (Apr 4, 2009)85.1 KiB756
Superfund meeting Thursday (Mar 1, 2006)85.9 KiB761
Superfund cleanups focus of public meetings in Butte (Feb 14, 2010)86.4 KiB1198
CTEC sets meeting (Sept 7, 2009)86.6 KiB1016
Plan to restore Montana river gets public review (Sept 2012)86.9 KiB1572
Feds order more Superfund work (Aug 5, 2011)88.3 KiB1053
Join public rally for SBC (Apr 4, 2009)88.6 KiB983
Mining-damaged areas focus of meetings (Nov. 27, 2012)89.6 KiB1383
Learn the jargon in 'Superfund 101' class (Dec 17, 2011)89.7 KiB1017
Editorial: EPA response disappointing (Apr 18, 2012)90.4 KiB1176
Local group critical of EPA in Butte (June 21, 2011)93.0 KiB1048
Public Health News
The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 2012)40.2 KiB1059
Butte residents concerned about open pit mine dust (May 2012)81.3 KiB1260
Letter: Is the EPA controlled by corporate interest? (Apr 2012)84.8 KiB1395
Letter to the Editor: Commenting on health study a ‘charade’ (Nov. 27, 2012)86.8 KiB1227
Arco defends EPA actions (Apr 2012)87.9 KiB1289
Letter: EPA was wrong to scoff at Barry’s report on Butte (Apr 2012)88.6 KiB1243
EPA response disappointing (Apr 2012)90.5 KiB1313
EPA seeks self-confirming study (Sept 2012)92.7 KiB1173
Butte cleanup meeting spiked (Apr 2012)93.8 KiB1283
Letter to the Editor: Health report fails to past test (Nov 2012)93.8 KiB1393
Free remediation program continues for Butte homes (Mar 2012)95.4 KiB1317
Cleanup ineffective in Butte (Mar 2012)100.4 KiB1484
EPA must address Butte health problems (Apr 2012)103.7 KiB1409
Author defends Butte death rates work (Apr 2012)104.3 KiB1583
Health study rouses anger (Jan. 17, 2013)107.6 KiB1508
EPA: Committed to Butte cleanup (Apr 2012)108.8 KiB1448
Mine dust and heavy metals among worries as Butte aims for health study (May 2012)109.1 KiB1500
EPA cleanup: Feds question Butte mortality study (Apr 2012)111.2 KiB1418

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>