In the News

Links to western Montana Superfund and environmental cleanup issues in the media.

In the News
MTPR Commentary: The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 12, 2012)14.4 KiB906
Public invited to meeting on Butte Superfund site cleanup (Mar 23, 2011)26.1 KiB850
Meeting held on Butte Superfund site (Jan 13, 2011)26.4 KiB856
Work begins on contaminated site in Opportunity (Sept 5, 2012)26.8 KiB872
DEQ lowering SBC dam to prevent contamination (June 14, 2011)27.0 KiB872
Officials: Clark Fork cleanup nearing home stretch (May 4, 2010)27.0 KiB843
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB885
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB826
SBC fishable again after multi-million dollar cleanup (May 22, 2012)30.7 KiB834
Read Stacie Barry's dissertation abstract on Butte environmental health study (Apr 17, 2012)82.6 KiB991
Letter: Butte Superfund five-year review shows mixed results (Mar 10, 2010)83.2 KiB963
Butte NRD council ready to go (Feb 10, 2010)83.8 KiB933
Comment time on clean-up plan (Sept 9, 2009)84.3 KiB985
Montana Pole meeting tonight (July 20, 2010)84.7 KiB1018
Creek rally is Tuesday (Apr 4, 2009)85.1 KiB712
Superfund meeting Thursday (Mar 1, 2006)85.9 KiB718
Superfund cleanups focus of public meetings in Butte (Feb 14, 2010)86.4 KiB1143
CTEC sets meeting (Sept 7, 2009)86.6 KiB948
Plan to restore Montana river gets public review (Sept 2012)86.9 KiB1470
Feds order more Superfund work (Aug 5, 2011)88.3 KiB983
Join public rally for SBC (Apr 4, 2009)88.6 KiB919
Mining-damaged areas focus of meetings (Nov. 27, 2012)89.6 KiB1293
Learn the jargon in 'Superfund 101' class (Dec 17, 2011)89.7 KiB955
Editorial: EPA response disappointing (Apr 18, 2012)90.4 KiB1119
Local group critical of EPA in Butte (June 21, 2011)93.0 KiB969
Public Health News
The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 2012)40.2 KiB948
Butte residents concerned about open pit mine dust (May 2012)81.3 KiB1184
Letter: Is the EPA controlled by corporate interest? (Apr 2012)84.8 KiB1304
Letter to the Editor: Commenting on health study a ‘charade’ (Nov. 27, 2012)86.8 KiB1142
Arco defends EPA actions (Apr 2012)87.9 KiB1202
Letter: EPA was wrong to scoff at Barry’s report on Butte (Apr 2012)88.6 KiB1151
EPA response disappointing (Apr 2012)90.5 KiB1216
EPA seeks self-confirming study (Sept 2012)92.7 KiB1090
Butte cleanup meeting spiked (Apr 2012)93.8 KiB1187
Letter to the Editor: Health report fails to past test (Nov 2012)93.8 KiB1263
Free remediation program continues for Butte homes (Mar 2012)95.4 KiB1233
Cleanup ineffective in Butte (Mar 2012)100.4 KiB1388
EPA must address Butte health problems (Apr 2012)103.7 KiB1280
Author defends Butte death rates work (Apr 2012)104.3 KiB1476
Health study rouses anger (Jan. 17, 2013)107.6 KiB1382
EPA: Committed to Butte cleanup (Apr 2012)108.8 KiB1357
Mine dust and heavy metals among worries as Butte aims for health study (May 2012)109.1 KiB1404
EPA cleanup: Feds question Butte mortality study (Apr 2012)111.2 KiB1321

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>