In the News

Links to western Montana Superfund and environmental cleanup issues in the media.

In the News
MTPR Commentary: The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 12, 2012)14.4 KiB927
Public invited to meeting on Butte Superfund site cleanup (Mar 23, 2011)26.1 KiB874
Meeting held on Butte Superfund site (Jan 13, 2011)26.4 KiB881
Work begins on contaminated site in Opportunity (Sept 5, 2012)26.8 KiB900
DEQ lowering SBC dam to prevent contamination (June 14, 2011)27.0 KiB898
Officials: Clark Fork cleanup nearing home stretch (May 4, 2010)27.0 KiB869
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB912
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB850
SBC fishable again after multi-million dollar cleanup (May 22, 2012)30.7 KiB860
Read Stacie Barry's dissertation abstract on Butte environmental health study (Apr 17, 2012)82.6 KiB1021
Letter: Butte Superfund five-year review shows mixed results (Mar 10, 2010)83.2 KiB989
Butte NRD council ready to go (Feb 10, 2010)83.8 KiB963
Comment time on clean-up plan (Sept 9, 2009)84.3 KiB1010
Montana Pole meeting tonight (July 20, 2010)84.7 KiB1042
Creek rally is Tuesday (Apr 4, 2009)85.1 KiB728
Superfund meeting Thursday (Mar 1, 2006)85.9 KiB734
Superfund cleanups focus of public meetings in Butte (Feb 14, 2010)86.4 KiB1168
CTEC sets meeting (Sept 7, 2009)86.6 KiB974
Plan to restore Montana river gets public review (Sept 2012)86.9 KiB1514
Feds order more Superfund work (Aug 5, 2011)88.3 KiB1015
Join public rally for SBC (Apr 4, 2009)88.6 KiB945
Mining-damaged areas focus of meetings (Nov. 27, 2012)89.6 KiB1325
Learn the jargon in 'Superfund 101' class (Dec 17, 2011)89.7 KiB982
Editorial: EPA response disappointing (Apr 18, 2012)90.4 KiB1145
Local group critical of EPA in Butte (June 21, 2011)93.0 KiB994
Public Health News
The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 2012)40.2 KiB979
Butte residents concerned about open pit mine dust (May 2012)81.3 KiB1214
Letter: Is the EPA controlled by corporate interest? (Apr 2012)84.8 KiB1340
Letter to the Editor: Commenting on health study a ‘charade’ (Nov. 27, 2012)86.8 KiB1170
Arco defends EPA actions (Apr 2012)87.9 KiB1243
Letter: EPA was wrong to scoff at Barry’s report on Butte (Apr 2012)88.6 KiB1185
EPA response disappointing (Apr 2012)90.5 KiB1259
EPA seeks self-confirming study (Sept 2012)92.7 KiB1119
Butte cleanup meeting spiked (Apr 2012)93.8 KiB1230
Letter to the Editor: Health report fails to past test (Nov 2012)93.8 KiB1298
Free remediation program continues for Butte homes (Mar 2012)95.4 KiB1268
Cleanup ineffective in Butte (Mar 2012)100.4 KiB1425
EPA must address Butte health problems (Apr 2012)103.7 KiB1323
Author defends Butte death rates work (Apr 2012)104.3 KiB1523
Health study rouses anger (Jan. 17, 2013)107.6 KiB1419
EPA: Committed to Butte cleanup (Apr 2012)108.8 KiB1391
Mine dust and heavy metals among worries as Butte aims for health study (May 2012)109.1 KiB1444
EPA cleanup: Feds question Butte mortality study (Apr 2012)111.2 KiB1359

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>