In the News

Links to western Montana Superfund and environmental cleanup issues in the media.

In the News
MTPR Commentary: The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 12, 2012)14.4 KiB969
Public invited to meeting on Butte Superfund site cleanup (Mar 23, 2011)26.1 KiB921
Meeting held on Butte Superfund site (Jan 13, 2011)26.4 KiB926
Work begins on contaminated site in Opportunity (Sept 5, 2012)26.8 KiB954
DEQ lowering SBC dam to prevent contamination (June 14, 2011)27.0 KiB953
Officials: Clark Fork cleanup nearing home stretch (May 4, 2010)27.0 KiB921
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB956
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB894
SBC fishable again after multi-million dollar cleanup (May 22, 2012)30.7 KiB914
Read Stacie Barry's dissertation abstract on Butte environmental health study (Apr 17, 2012)82.6 KiB1073
Letter: Butte Superfund five-year review shows mixed results (Mar 10, 2010)83.2 KiB1040
Butte NRD council ready to go (Feb 10, 2010)83.8 KiB1014
Comment time on clean-up plan (Sept 9, 2009)84.3 KiB1054
Montana Pole meeting tonight (July 20, 2010)84.7 KiB1091
Creek rally is Tuesday (Apr 4, 2009)85.1 KiB769
Superfund meeting Thursday (Mar 1, 2006)85.9 KiB774
Superfund cleanups focus of public meetings in Butte (Feb 14, 2010)86.4 KiB1208
CTEC sets meeting (Sept 7, 2009)86.6 KiB1037
Plan to restore Montana river gets public review (Sept 2012)86.9 KiB1593
Feds order more Superfund work (Aug 5, 2011)88.3 KiB1068
Join public rally for SBC (Apr 4, 2009)88.6 KiB1003
Mining-damaged areas focus of meetings (Nov. 27, 2012)89.6 KiB1403
Learn the jargon in 'Superfund 101' class (Dec 17, 2011)89.7 KiB1029
Editorial: EPA response disappointing (Apr 18, 2012)90.4 KiB1185
Local group critical of EPA in Butte (June 21, 2011)93.0 KiB1063
Public Health News
The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 2012)40.2 KiB1089
Butte residents concerned about open pit mine dust (May 2012)81.3 KiB1291
Letter: Is the EPA controlled by corporate interest? (Apr 2012)84.8 KiB1422
Letter to the Editor: Commenting on health study a ‘charade’ (Nov. 27, 2012)86.8 KiB1254
Arco defends EPA actions (Apr 2012)87.9 KiB1321
Letter: EPA was wrong to scoff at Barry’s report on Butte (Apr 2012)88.6 KiB1272
EPA response disappointing (Apr 2012)90.5 KiB1338
EPA seeks self-confirming study (Sept 2012)92.7 KiB1200
Butte cleanup meeting spiked (Apr 2012)93.8 KiB1314
Letter to the Editor: Health report fails to past test (Nov 2012)93.8 KiB1433
Free remediation program continues for Butte homes (Mar 2012)95.4 KiB1339
Cleanup ineffective in Butte (Mar 2012)100.4 KiB1508
EPA must address Butte health problems (Apr 2012)103.7 KiB1446
Author defends Butte death rates work (Apr 2012)104.3 KiB1611
Health study rouses anger (Jan. 17, 2013)107.6 KiB1542
EPA: Committed to Butte cleanup (Apr 2012)108.8 KiB1479
Mine dust and heavy metals among worries as Butte aims for health study (May 2012)109.1 KiB1530
EPA cleanup: Feds question Butte mortality study (Apr 2012)111.2 KiB1448

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>