Get It promo

Cleanup ineffective in Butte

2012-03-14T10:21:00Z Cleanup ineffective in ButteBy John Ray Mtstandard.com
March 14, 2012 10:21 am  • 

The safety of the people shall be the highest law. Cicero

Superfund’s purpose is to protect the public’s health and the environment from the threat of toxics exposure by cleaning up contaminated sites. A recently released report entitled Summary of Environmental Health Studies in Butte-Silver Bow by Dr. Stacie Barry, which was submitted to the Butte Health Department, calls into serious question the efficacy of 29 years of Superfund cleanup in Butte. The report’s data leads one to the clear conclusion that the massive “cleanup” of Butte is not working to protect human health and the environment. The report states that mortality rates from the types of cancer associated with metals exposure are higher in Butte than the state of Montana’s and the United States as a whole and that these rates have remained high and even increased after Superfund remediation. The report concludes that remediation has not reduced mortality rates. (Summary, page 81) After carefully reviewing publicly available data and past studies, Dr. Barry’s carefully and meticulously documented study finds “that living in the Butte landscape leads to higher mortality rates for all diseases. . . .” (p. 79) The study’s conclusion should be nothing new to EPA in that numerous past studies have found extremely high rates of cancer of the types correlated with metals exposure.

The only bright spot in the Butte Superfund picture is the Residential Metals Abatement Program (RMAP). The Barry report does find a decrease in neurological disease which “potentially correlates to the extensive lead abatement program in the city.” (p. iii) RMAP is the one notable Superfund success in Butte.

Why has Superfund largely failed in Butte? Four reasons:

1. The EPA did not adequately characterize the toxics of concern in Butte. “The risk assessments performed for the Butte Priority Soils Operable Unit investigated risks associated with arsenic and lead and did not investigate the other contaminants of concern. (Aluminum, cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, mercury, silver, and zinc.) Importantly, the EPA never investigated the synergistic, additive, and antagonistic toxicological aspects of the interaction between the chemicals. (p. 14) “The Priority Soils Superfund Program Cleanup Proposal states that the highest concentrations of arsenic, lead, and mercury are in attic dust, but because the attics are not considered living space, they are not considered in the risk assessment.” (p. 14) Also, the EPA never performed an ecological risk assessment for Butte. Sample sizes used by the EPA were too small to be statistically significant. (p. 78) The EPA also ignored “pathways such as exposure from dermal contact, fetal uptakes and newborn uptake from the mother, and ingestion of food from gardens.” (p. 16) The EPA did not consider arsenic exposure from skin contact and from dirt, surface water or groundwater. (p. 16)

2. The remediation action levels set by EPA were too permissive. Unlike other areas, Butte was saddled with cleanup action levels that do not protect human health.

3. The EPA did not adequately characterize the extent of citizen exposure to toxic substances. The EPA focused on acute not chronic exposure of Butte residents to toxic metals. In the case of lead exposure, the EPA didn’t even look at lead from Butte but used studies of lead exposure in East Helena and Midvale, Utah and, without support, extrapolated to Butte. (pp. 15-16)

4. The EPA failed to remove toxics from Butte but largely left them in place to pose a perpetual threat to human health. One reason the lead abatement program (RMAP) is working so well, unlike most of the Butte cleanup, is that it removes toxic lead.

The Barry report is an independent and important review which once again calls into serious question Superfund’s efficacy in Butte. Superfund has not worked in Butte. Superfund has not protected the health and environment of Butte residents. EPA owes Butte an explanation as to why Butte has had to settle for a second rate, non-protective cleanup. Butte citizens should demand a real cleanup for our city. One measure of success is effectiveness. By that measure, Superfund has failed Butte. Dr. Barry has done Butte citizens a great service and her report should motivate local leaders to hold EPA accountable. So far EPA has only been accountable to itself; that must change.

Submitted by:

Dr. John W. Ray

915 West Galena St.

Butte, Montana 59701

406 782-0681

(5) Comments

  1. buttepayer
    Report Abuse
    buttepayer - March 21, 2012 8:32 pm
    Yes, take out the tailings and try to clean the waterway. I agree with those who think this is critically needed. But, the intimate relationship with smelter dust, loaded with arsenic and lead, is in the buildings, not under the Civic Center. Yet, our preservation leadership tells us we have to bathe in these pollutants forever in the filthy non-code homes. As bad in the category of air quality damage from the past and present, is caused by diesel fumes loaded with benzene. Children and young people are currently suffering from these exposures. The heartbreak is overwhelming.
  2. Berkeley Pitts
    Report Abuse
    Berkeley Pitts - March 18, 2012 11:13 am
    Everyone in the state has a Montana Constitutional "right to a clean and healthful environment" except the people of Butte whose state representatives and senators all vote with the Republicans to do away with environmental laws. The mining profiteers still run Butte despite the ordinary people dying young due to the poisons mining leaves behind. And EPA's lack of concern for human health and the environment is the biggest cover up of all.
  3. Comparadun
    Report Abuse
    Comparadun - March 15, 2012 10:31 am
    buttepayer said: "Ray's list of causes includes the biggest culprit - the crazy-high action levels set by EPA, based on terribly bad science. Of course we are not getting well with the "clean up." The "waste in place" solution creates a background toxicity that has been called into question by many respected scientists. The only answer is to drop the action level to something reasonably associated with human health, and then amend the RODs. Instead, we have public meetings about citizen input that will be, in essence, putting a band-aid on a gaping chest wound."

    Indeed! The sooner someone in the position to do so, makes the move to get it done, the better. Starting with the Parrot Tailings. Let's get that mess cleaned up so that the land can actually be used for new businesses that can hire folks with real jobs. Big Daddy ARCO is gonna leave town as soon as they can get out. After that, it will be too late.
  4. JackO
    Report Abuse
    JackO - March 14, 2012 11:02 pm
    John Ray is correct as is Butte taxpayer... however both conclude something can be done. Not me. No way. The truth is this: Nothing will be done about it... Nothing of any real value... because the scope of the damage enormous and nobody will ever willingly pay the costs.

    Consequences of massive resource extraction, digging, damming, washing, draining, burning, and chemical processing are toxic... Poison. P P P Period. Everyone wants development but nobody wants cleanup and repair. Well... Tough Bounce. The costs of resource extraction are enormous... overwhelming... and they come due long after profits are shared out. You can build a nuclear reactor but it will cost you 10 times that amount to tear it down when it comes time. Marcus Daily won't pay for it. Haguette Clarke wont pay for it. Nobody will pay for it. That's the truth. All that's left after the profits are taken, is the wailing wall of spilled milk... and then... it's tough if we don't like it. Tough bounce.
  5. buttepayer
    Report Abuse
    buttepayer - March 14, 2012 6:34 pm
    Ray's list of causes includes the biggest culprit - the crazy-high action levels set by EPA, based on terribly bad science. Of course we are not getting well with the "clean up." The "waste in place" solution creates a background toxicity that has been called into question by many respected scientists. The only answer is to drop the action level to something reasonably associated with human health, and then amend the RODs. Instead, we have public meetings about citizen input that will be, in essence, putting a band-aid on a gaping chest wound.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Copyright 2012 Mtstandard.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Featured Business Offers

Shea Realtors

We have a great new listing in Uptown Butte - Find real estate in Butte MT with Shea Realtors

This older style brick house is completely renovated.  On the …

Regan Financial Services, Inc

Call Regan Financial Services for Boat, RV and Motorcycle Insurance in Butte MT

  Call us today to compare your RV, boat, and motorcycle insur…

Steele's Furniture

Don't miss the Ekornes sales event! Get up to $1500 off furniture in Butte MT at Steele's!

Get up to $1500 off* Stressless® product when you buy any Stre…

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Contact Wells Fargo Home Mortgage in Butte MT for a free home buying consultation!

Contact us today and start the homebuying process with a free …

Employment Marketplace

Featured Businesses

Poll

Loading…

Do TV's political attack ads influence you?

View Results