In the News

Links to western Montana Superfund and environmental cleanup issues in the media.

NameSizeHits
NameSizeHits
In the News
Creek rally is Tuesday (Apr 4, 2009)85.1 KiB828
Superfund meeting Thursday (Mar 1, 2006)85.9 KiB835
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB999
SBC fishable again after multi-million dollar cleanup (May 22, 2012)30.7 KiB1018
Public invited to meeting on Butte Superfund site cleanup (Mar 23, 2011)26.1 KiB1024
Meeting held on Butte Superfund site (Jan 13, 2011)26.4 KiB1026
Officials: Clark Fork cleanup nearing home stretch (May 4, 2010)27.0 KiB1031
DEQ lowering SBC dam to prevent contamination (June 14, 2011)27.0 KiB1064
Work begins on contaminated site in Opportunity (Sept 5, 2012)26.8 KiB1067
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB1071
MTPR Commentary: The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 12, 2012)14.4 KiB1084
Join public rally for SBC (Apr 4, 2009)88.6 KiB1130
Pole plant cleanup meeting Tuesday (July 18, 2010)96.7 KiB1131
Comment time on clean-up plan (Sept 9, 2009)84.3 KiB1136
Learn the jargon in 'Superfund 101' class (Dec 17, 2011)89.7 KiB1152
Butte NRD council ready to go (Feb 10, 2010)83.8 KiB1153
CTEC sets meeting (Sept 7, 2009)86.6 KiB1159
Local group critical of EPA in Butte (June 21, 2011)93.0 KiB1171
Letter: Butte Superfund five-year review shows mixed results (Mar 10, 2010)83.2 KiB1172
Feds order more Superfund work (Aug 5, 2011)88.3 KiB1175
Montana Pole meeting tonight (July 20, 2010)84.7 KiB1189
Read Stacie Barry's dissertation abstract on Butte environmental health study (Apr 17, 2012)82.6 KiB1197
Editorial: EPA response disappointing (Apr 18, 2012)90.4 KiB1297
Superfund cleanups focus of public meetings in Butte (Feb 14, 2010)86.4 KiB1311
Mining-damaged areas focus of meetings (Nov. 27, 2012)89.6 KiB1522
Public Health News
The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 2012)40.2 KiB1268
EPA seeks self-confirming study (Sept 2012)92.7 KiB1285
Letter to the Editor: Commenting on health study a ‘charade’ (Nov. 27, 2012)86.8 KiB1347
Letter: EPA was wrong to scoff at Barry’s report on Butte (Apr 2012)88.6 KiB1369
Butte cleanup meeting spiked (Apr 2012)93.8 KiB1418
Arco defends EPA actions (Apr 2012)87.9 KiB1422
Butte residents concerned about open pit mine dust (May 2012)81.3 KiB1423
Free remediation program continues for Butte homes (Mar 2012)95.4 KiB1449
EPA response disappointing (Apr 2012)90.5 KiB1450
Letter: Is the EPA controlled by corporate interest? (Apr 2012)84.8 KiB1535
EPA cleanup: Feds question Butte mortality study (Apr 2012)111.2 KiB1554
EPA: Committed to Butte cleanup (Apr 2012)108.8 KiB1575
Letter to the Editor: Health report fails to past test (Nov 2012)93.8 KiB1593
EPA must address Butte health problems (Apr 2012)103.7 KiB1606
Cleanup ineffective in Butte (Mar 2012)100.4 KiB1615
Mine dust and heavy metals among worries as Butte aims for health study (May 2012)109.1 KiB1638
Author defends Butte death rates work (Apr 2012)104.3 KiB1727
Health study rouses anger (Jan. 17, 2013)107.6 KiB1728
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>