In the News

Links to western Montana Superfund and environmental cleanup issues in the media.

In the News
MTPR Commentary: The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 12, 2012)14.4 KiB1041
Public invited to meeting on Butte Superfund site cleanup (Mar 23, 2011)26.1 KiB984
Meeting held on Butte Superfund site (Jan 13, 2011)26.4 KiB986
Work begins on contaminated site in Opportunity (Sept 5, 2012)26.8 KiB1023
DEQ lowering SBC dam to prevent contamination (June 14, 2011)27.0 KiB1023
Officials: Clark Fork cleanup nearing home stretch (May 4, 2010)27.0 KiB988
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB1028
Butte group focused on Superfund cleanup to hold public meetings (Feb 15, 2010)27.2 KiB961
SBC fishable again after multi-million dollar cleanup (May 22, 2012)30.7 KiB977
Read Stacie Barry's dissertation abstract on Butte environmental health study (Apr 17, 2012)82.6 KiB1162
Letter: Butte Superfund five-year review shows mixed results (Mar 10, 2010)83.2 KiB1140
Butte NRD council ready to go (Feb 10, 2010)83.8 KiB1118
Comment time on clean-up plan (Sept 9, 2009)84.3 KiB1102
Montana Pole meeting tonight (July 20, 2010)84.7 KiB1160
Creek rally is Tuesday (Apr 4, 2009)85.1 KiB818
Superfund meeting Thursday (Mar 1, 2006)85.9 KiB826
Superfund cleanups focus of public meetings in Butte (Feb 14, 2010)86.4 KiB1270
CTEC sets meeting (Sept 7, 2009)86.6 KiB1131
Plan to restore Montana river gets public review (Sept 2012)86.9 KiB1700
Feds order more Superfund work (Aug 5, 2011)88.3 KiB1148
Join public rally for SBC (Apr 4, 2009)88.6 KiB1098
Mining-damaged areas focus of meetings (Nov. 27, 2012)89.6 KiB1498
Learn the jargon in 'Superfund 101' class (Dec 17, 2011)89.7 KiB1108
Editorial: EPA response disappointing (Apr 18, 2012)90.4 KiB1255
Local group critical of EPA in Butte (June 21, 2011)93.0 KiB1142
Public Health News
The EPA Should Work With Us, Not Against Us (Apr 2012)40.2 KiB1206
Butte residents concerned about open pit mine dust (May 2012)81.3 KiB1400
Letter: Is the EPA controlled by corporate interest? (Apr 2012)84.8 KiB1508
Letter to the Editor: Commenting on health study a ‘charade’ (Nov. 27, 2012)86.8 KiB1326
Arco defends EPA actions (Apr 2012)87.9 KiB1395
Letter: EPA was wrong to scoff at Barry’s report on Butte (Apr 2012)88.6 KiB1348
EPA response disappointing (Apr 2012)90.5 KiB1425
EPA seeks self-confirming study (Sept 2012)92.7 KiB1263
Butte cleanup meeting spiked (Apr 2012)93.8 KiB1386
Letter to the Editor: Health report fails to past test (Nov 2012)93.8 KiB1539
Free remediation program continues for Butte homes (Mar 2012)95.4 KiB1429
Cleanup ineffective in Butte (Mar 2012)100.4 KiB1582
EPA must address Butte health problems (Apr 2012)103.7 KiB1575
Author defends Butte death rates work (Apr 2012)104.3 KiB1699
Health study rouses anger (Jan. 17, 2013)107.6 KiB1673
EPA: Committed to Butte cleanup (Apr 2012)108.8 KiB1551
Mine dust and heavy metals among worries as Butte aims for health study (May 2012)109.1 KiB1605
EPA cleanup: Feds question Butte mortality study (Apr 2012)111.2 KiB1531

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>