Get It promo

Sliding pit walls raise concern

2013-03-10T00:00:00Z Sliding pit walls raise concernBy John Grant Emeigh of The Montana Standard Montana Standard

Fifteen years ago, as state researchers ventured into the Berkeley Pit to collect their annual samples from the contaminated water, a surprise greeted them.

On this particular day in September, the pontoon boat they use to troll across the water wasn’t docked at its usual spot. Instead, they found the craft about 40 feet above the water, parked on a flat area along the pit’s rocky wall.

How did it get there? A landslide created a large wave, carrying the boat up in the water and docking it on the upper wall, according to Ted Duaime of the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology.

Duaime, a hydrogeologist, said it was one of the largest landslides recorded in the pit, and it forced a significant wave. Similar landslides — although on a smaller scale — continue to occur in the pit, Duaime said.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, reported three landslides that have created wave action over the last seven months in the pit, documents show. The most recent occurred on Feb. 8.

Sara Sparks, remedial project manager with the EPA in Butte, acknowledged these incidents have happened, but the community shouldn’t worry.

“There’s been some wave action, but no threat to public health or the environment,” Sparks told The Montana Standard in a recent interview.

Slides were also reported on Aug. 22, 2012, and Nov. 3, 2012. Sparks said these slides occurred on the southeastern wall, which she said is made up of alluvial soil. While the rest of the pit is encased by more solid rock, the sloughing portion is composed of sand, clay and loose material.

The 1998 landslide — the one that left the pontoon boat 40 feet above the water — dropped 1.3 million cubic yards of material into the pit, according to Duaime. This was enough to affect the water level, he said.

Though the three recent slides were much smaller than the 1998 incident, Duaime said the February slide was still pretty large. The pontoon boat sustained minor dents when wave action slammed it into the dock. However, it wasn’t pushed out of the water as in the 1998 slide.

Duaime said his team noted that the last slide caused the water level to rise in the pit by one foot.

“That’s a fairly significant rise,” he said.

Despite the rise due to displacement from the landslide, Duaime said the water level remains below the rim of the pit. Barring a catastrophic event — such as a major earthquake — Duaime doesn’t believe these landslides will cause water to escape the pit.

The water level is about 200 feet below the rim at its lowest elevation, and about 100 feet below the critical level, Duaime said. The critical level, which was set by the EPA and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, is the point at which the pit water could potentially seep into the groundwater aquifers. The critical level is set at 5,410 feet above sea level.

The pit water rises about a half to three-quarters of a foot each month, Duaime said.

Montana Tech professor John Ray has been outspoken with his concerns about the Berkeley Pit for years. In February, Ray sent an email to the EPA with questions concerning the slides and structural integrity of the Berkeley Pit. He told The Montana Standard he was disappointed with the answers, saying they were perfunctory and lacked detail.

“If there’s some problem with the structural soundness of the pit and a problem with water displacement, the public needs to know,” Ray said.

He added that he would like the Montana EPA and DEQ to address these concerns in some type of public forum, which has been set for March 19. See breakout.

Tom Malloy, county reclamation manager, works on the county’s team for cleaning and restoring land in Butte damaged by past mining. Malloy said he’s interested in the environmental effects of the pit’s landslides.

“I’d like to see better communication with the public from the MR (Montana Resources) and oversight groups,” Malloy said.

The Berkeley Pit is owned by the Montana Resources mining company. Tad Dale, vice president of human resources and spokesman for Montana Resources, could not be reached for comment, after repeated attempts last week by The Standard.

Open pit mining was in operation at the Berkeley Pit from 1955 to 1982. The pit is 1,780 feet deep with a four-mile circumference. The pit began filling with water after it ceased operations in 1982 and Atlantic Richfield shut off the pumps that kept water out of the pit.

— Reporter John Grant Emeigh may be reached via email at or phone at 496-5511. Follow him at

(2) Comments

  1. juanajob
    Report Abuse
    juanajob - March 14, 2013 6:58 am
    Don't worry. The worse that can happen is flooding the country club golf course with toxic water. Wheeze butte people we can handle this
  2. mountain
    Report Abuse
    mountain - March 10, 2013 6:22 pm
    This is awful and dangerous people should worry and they need to keep on top of this situation all that poison water and it keeps rising its very sad for butte people to live there and they will need to be on there guard.susan wickham

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at, or call Editor Gerry O'Brien at 496-5513. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Copyright 2013 Montana Standard. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Follow the Montana Standard


The Montana Standard on Facebook


The Montana Standard on Twitter


Get email updates from The Montana Standard

Email Updates


Follow The Montana Standard via RSS

RSS Feeds

Find Events

Featured Business Offers

Employment Marketplace

Featured Businesses



Do you agree with the agreement between the Bureau of Land Management and a private landowner that allows 300 wild horses to live northwest of Ennis?

View Results